ESPAÑOL
McGillivary Steele Elkin Hero Background Image

October 6, 2022

Putative Class Action Lawsuit Alleges That Wal-Mart Unlawfully Rescinded Employment Offer After Lead Plaintiff Tested Positive for Marijuana

In February 2021, the New Jersey Cannabis Regulatory Enforcement Assistance and Marketplace Modernization Act (“Cannabis Act”) went into effect, making it unlawful for employers in the state to refuse employment to job candidates solely because they have received a positive drug test result indicating they have cannabis/marijuana in their body.
Home » News » Putative Class Action Lawsuit Alleges That Wal-Mart Unlawfully Rescinded Employment Offer After Lead Plaintiff Tested Positive for Marijuana

Sarah M. Block
Thu, 10/06/2022

In February 2021, the New Jersey Cannabis Regulatory Enforcement Assistance and Marketplace Modernization Act (“Cannabis Act”) went into effect, making it unlawful for employers in the state to refuse employment to job candidates solely because they have received a positive drug test result indicating they have cannabis/marijuana in their body. However, a New Jersey man alleges in a putative class action lawsuit that Wal-Mart and Sam’s Club recently did just that.

On June 13, 2022, Erick Zanetich filed suit against Wal-Mart and Sam’s Club in New Jersey state court, alleging that the stores violated the Cannabis Act when they rescinded an offer of employment for a security-related position on the grounds that he had tested positive for marijuana during a mandatory pre-employment drug test. Zanetich brought the case on behalf of himself and a class of all persons who were denied employment by Wal-Mart in the state of New Jersey because they tested positive for marijuana in a pre-employment drug screen or were subject to any other adverse employment action because of testing positive for marijuana. Wal-Mart removed the case to the federal court on September 2, 2022, in part because Zanetich’s allegations demonstrate that the damages sought in the case exceed $75,000. The case, which is still in the early stages, is now pending under the caption Zanetich v. Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc., Case No. 1:22-cv-05387 (D.N.J.).

If you believe you have suffered an unlawful adverse employment action or have been wrongfully denied employment on prohibited grounds, please contact MSE today to learn more about your rights.

Legal Representation for All Workers

When McGillivary Steele Elkin LLP decides to take your case, it is because we believe there is an unacceptable workplace violation that has negatively impacted you or resulted in your employer paying less than what the law requires and which we have a reasonable chance of remedying. We recognize that meritorious claims should not go unremedied because of the level of a person’s resources.

To ensure accessible and available legal representation for all our clients, MSE handles cases through different forms of fee arrangements, including contingency fees, hourly fees and fixed fees.

McGillivary Steele Elkin Chat Icon