ESPAÑOL
McGillivary Steele Elkin Hero Background Image

September 14, 2023

Ninth Circuit rejects Nevada city’s push to enforce arbitration agreement in a CBA

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently reviewed an appeal from the City of Sparks, Nevada appealing the decision by the lower court to not enforce an arbitration agreement within a Collective Bargaining Agreement. In Forbush v. City of Sparks, Civil Action No. 22-15079, the plaintiff alleged that his employer retaliated against him because he engaged in conduct protected by the First Amendment.
Home » News » Ninth Circuit rejects Nevada city’s push to enforce arbitration agreement in a CBA

Sophia Serrao
Thu, 09/14/2023

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently reviewed an appeal from the City of Sparks, Nevada appealing the decision by the lower court to not enforce an arbitration agreement within a Collective Bargaining Agreement. In Forbush v. City of Sparks, Civil Action No. 22-15079, the plaintiff alleged that his employer retaliated against him because he engaged in conduct protected by the First Amendment.

According to the Ninth Circuit stated that a Collective Bargaining Agreement (“CBA”) can waive employee’s rights to bring statutory claims in court only if the waiver is “clear and unmistakable,” meaning that the agreement to arbitrate must be explicitly stated in the CBA. In this case, no such clear language existed as the grievance procedure applied only to employee disputes concerning the interpretation and application of the CBA. The Court reasoned that the plaintiff’s claim did not require applying or interpreting the CBA itself, and therefore his right to bring his claim in court was not waived by an arbitration agreement.

Legal Representation for All Workers

When McGillivary Steele Elkin LLP decides to take your case, it is because we believe there is an unacceptable workplace violation that has negatively impacted you or resulted in your employer paying less than what the law requires and which we have a reasonable chance of remedying. We recognize that meritorious claims should not go unremedied because of the level of a person’s resources.

To ensure accessible and available legal representation for all our clients, MSE handles cases through different forms of fee arrangements, including contingency fees, hourly fees and fixed fees.

McGillivary Steele Elkin Chat Icon